Simplifying Hyperslab Reads with H5CPP
The Problem (Bert Bril, Apr 26, 2018)
Bert was trying to read a single column from a massive 3D dataset:
short data[251];
hsize_t count[3] = {1, 1, 251};
hsize_t offset[3] = {0, 0, 0};
hsize_t stride[3] = {1, 1, 1};
filedataset.selectHyperslab(H5S_SELECT_SET, count, offset, stride);
H5::DataSpace input = filedataset.getSpace();
H5::DataSpace output(1, &nrtoread);
dataset_->read(data, H5::PredType::STD_I16LE, output, input);
3786 0 0 3555 0 0 3820 …
Even simpler 1D reads using a 3D hyperslab weren’t behaving as expected—and Bert couldn’t figure out why.
Steven Varga to the Rescue (Apr 26, 2018)
Steven’s suggestion? Toss the boilerplate and go with H5CPP—a clean, MIT-licensed, header-only C++ template library for HDF5 that makes multidimensional, Armadillo-style reads so much simpler:
“Reading a cube into an arma::cube
is one-step—see the Armadillo example—and use arma::Cube
instead of arma::Mat
.”
H5CPP is well-documented, functional, with examples, and integrates with major linear-algebra libraries.
— Steve
H5CPP lets you sidestep manual DataSpace manipulations by offering high-level read()
calls that feel like native matrix slicing.
Why This Helps
Approach | Complexity | Behavior Clarity | Extensibility |
---|---|---|---|
Manual Hyperslab (HDF5 C++) | High | Error-prone and subtle | Hard to debug |
H5CPP (template-based) | Low | Clear intent and results | Easy integration with arma, eigen, etc. |
What to Do Next
-
Try H5CPP—especially for reading cubes, columns, or slices with Armadillo support.
-
Skip the complex hyperslab boilerplate and reach for a higher-level
read()
that feels like:
- If you’re still seeing missing elements, compare dimension ordering or endian assumptions—but often H5CPP's clean interface surfaces logic over noise.